From this point, was to increase the number of U.S. financial institutions seeking government assistance. The government tried to support some of the absence of institutions with hundreds of billions of dollars in taxpayers’ money, however, as economic instability, swelling, liquidity in the credit market has not improved. As a result of the nationalization of some banks has become a disputed topic.

At first glance, looks like the nationalization of a viable and attractive solution. Good assets are returned to the private sector and toxic debts are divided, contained and addressed. So what is down? Why would the government act quickly to nationalize the banks and remove this anchor on the U.S. economy? First, the nationalization of banks would eliminate the shareholders. Second, banks may be changed in the interest of politicians. Finally, the nationalization of the bank can reduce the value of the U.S. dollar.

Complete nationalization of banks such as Citigroup and Bank of Bank of America will destroy shareholders. Although the president, Obama said that his administration is not interested in controlling Bailed out banks, it could be argued that when the government becomes the majority shareholder, it is under control, and the bank is essentially a public company. In the case of bank Citigroup, for example, the third phase is scheduled to leave the U.S. government rescue of holding 40% shares of Citigroup’s. If the U.S. government would nationalize the bank, the bank Citigroup preferred stock owned by the government will convert into ordinary shares and, consequently, the current shareholders will be destroyed. This is one reason the current pressure on bank stocks. As the world watched on February 20, 2009, fear that the government will fully nationalize banks has caused shares of Citigroup Bank and Bank of America fall.

Government control over these two giant banks could ultimately benefit the politicians. History proves that when the federal government-owned commercial banks, he abused his power. Although only 20% of the Second Bank of the United States, was owned by the government, the bank effectively controlled by the President and Congress. It was riddled with fraud and corruption, and ultimately went bankrupt. The most recent example is the house bank. In addition, we must not forget that these financial institutions have been large, but less complicated and only works with millions of dollars in assets. Today banks are interconnected throughout the system, and they control trillions of dollars in assets worldwide.

Even if the Obama administration is against the direct control of banks, the government will still own 40% of the shares of Citigroup’s. As a result, the government’s largest shareholder, and some may argue, resulting in the bank, which will be driven by political goals, to some extent. There are already political rules and restrictions that are putting pressure on financial institutions, but with public property, this policy could dramatically intensify.

Nationalization of banks may also have a negative impact on the U.S. dollar. If the exchange rate of the dollar falls against other currencies, the U.S. could experience an increase in its debts and liabilities. Thus, American taxpayers will stand to lose the most. Such negative effects of nationalization have already seen in other countries. For example, in February 2008 the British government nationalized the bank Northern Rock. As a result, the British pound fell from 1.9638 to a minimum of 1.9363 within 3 days of trading.

There is much disagreement about the Citigroup Bank and Bank of America should be nationalized. Those who oppose the issue believe that the nationalization of the bank will erase the current shareholders could benefit from U.S. politicians, not the taxpayers and may increase the debt of the Federal Reserve and obligations in relation to the possible fall of the dollar. In addition, nationalization would almost certainly mean more rules, which would reduce the incentives and may weaken the economy further. While some may find short-term benefits of the nationalization of banks in the U.S., we must not forget that everyone goes to the benefit of greater value long term. In this case, taxpayers will pay a high price.
learn forex trading foreign currency trading forex free trading